Latest Post in 'Global & International'

19:13, 28 August 2010

By James Rogers

Last week, economists stated that China overtook Japan to become the world’s third largest economy (after the United States and European Union). By 2050, China is projected to have overtaken both to become the world’s largest economy; by 2100, China may be larger than both combined. On some accounts, it is already the leading industrial power, consuming the lion’s share of iron ore and manufacturing more steel than any other country – and by a large margin. The nine-day long traffic jam on the motorway between Beijing and Jining reported on Tuesday only symbolises the vast scale of China’s economic and industrial enterprise. Many of the vehicles involved were lorries carrying coal to power up the large factories in China’s rapidly growing coastal cities.

What does this all mean? At the very least, it seems that seven centuries of European (or Western) hegemony might be very near its end. China (and India) may be about to retake their positions as the nodal points of the global economy, a position they held for much of human history. This is still not pre-ordained: China may experience many social, environmental and political dislocations, which could derail its progress, either permanently or temporarily. This led me to wonder a bit more about the foundations of European power. How did such a small and seemingly irrelevant region of the world become so powerful? Why are the world’s leading languages today English, French and Spanish and not Chinese and Hindi? Why do modern Chinese and Indian cities resemble those of Europe and America and not the other way round?

The old argument is that Europeans raped both countries of their resources, setting them back by two centuries. Yet this ill-conceived and exceedingly tired argument – even if true – still begs the question of how they were able to do so in the first place, given that China and India seemed, initially, to be stronger and more advanced than Europeans? There are, as I see it, ten key foundations of European power, which have enabled this relatively small continent to rise up over the past six centuries and transform the world:

YouTube Preview Image

The key thing, of course, is that none of these components were by themselves sufficient. It was only as the foundations of power came together in synthesis that Europeans achieved an edge over other continents. The only question remaining, then, is what will happen to Europeans if they give up the means that provided them with this ‘edge’ – and if the rest of the world catches up?

• For anyone interested in these questions, I recommend the documentary series entitled The Day the World Took Off, which was made to commemorate the Millennium by a group of academics based at the University of Cambridge. Click here to download each programme.

• Images: World Map: RokerHRO; Fields: Mattias Süßen; Horses: Mikel Ortega; Bread: Chmee2; Star Fort: Gebruiker: Bourtange.

Recent Posts in 'Global & International'

5:32, 19 July 2010

Why have European studies and strategic studies ignored one another for so long? Why should scholars from both disciplines be more interested in one another’s work? And what can grand strategy’s utility be for research into European foreign, security and military policies?

1:53, 3 July 2010

Are the United States and European Union drifting apart? What will this mean for both powers in an increasingly non-European world? And how can a new alliance be formed between two equal partners?

13:32, 30 June 2010

The European Union was supposed to abolish European geopolitics through the extension of ‘civilian power’. But recent developments, including the retreat of American power and the resurgence of Russia, has altered the geopolitical balance in Europe. Does this provide a new opportunity for the United Kingdom?

1:34, 6 June 2010

This video explains the geography of American, Chinese, Indian and European power in Eurasia’s maritime zone and how the region is likely to evolve over the next few decades.

2:06, 6 May 2010

Why will the European Union be unable to develop a strong and close relationship with South Korea? How can this deficit in what might otherwise be a tight political and economic relationship be remedied? What must Europeans do?

5:06, 24 March 2010

Where are Britain and France’s overseas military stations located? How do they cover the world map? What could be their eventual purpose? This short video reveals all!

2:13, 21 March 2010

The reshaping of the global order started essentially with the fall of the Berlin Wall. However, this new emerging order had been in incubation for years. Today, it has reached maturity: this is the Copenhagen Syndrome. And Europeans better get used to it – and redefine their policies accordingly, in recognition of the European interest.

21:37, 14 March 2010

What is geostrategy? Does it lead to conquest, imperialism and empire? Is it about power and control? It can be those things and it can lead to ruinous behaviour. But does it have to be? Think again…

11:51, 12 March 2010

The President of the European Council stated in his speech to the College of Europe that the European Union needed ‘collective fleet action’ – greater foreign policy co-ordination – but what form should this take? What matters and what does not?

Comments Off

13:44, 26 February 2010

President Herman Van Rompuy is often poked as a figure of fun. But does his first speech on foreign and security policy reflect a closet Machiavellian, plotting and strategising to flesh out the European interest?

FireStats icon Powered by FireStats