Latest Post Tagged 'Geopolitics'

European Geostrategy | 19:13, 28 August 2010

By James Rogers

Last week, economists stated that China overtook Japan to become the world’s third largest economy (after the United States and European Union). By 2050, China is projected to have overtaken both to become the world’s largest economy; by 2100, China may be larger than both combined. On some accounts, it is already the leading industrial power, consuming the lion’s share of iron ore and manufacturing more steel than any other country – and by a large margin. The nine-day long traffic jam on the motorway between Beijing and Jining reported on Tuesday only symbolises the vast scale of China’s economic and industrial enterprise. Many of the vehicles involved were lorries carrying coal to power up the large factories in China’s rapidly growing coastal cities.

What does this all mean? At the very least, it seems that seven centuries of European (or Western) hegemony might be very near its end. China (and India) may be about to retake their positions as the nodal points of the global economy, a position they held for much of human history. This is still not pre-ordained: China may experience many social, environmental and political dislocations, which could derail its progress, either permanently or temporarily. This led me to wonder a bit more about the foundations of European power. How did such a small and seemingly irrelevant region of the world become so powerful? Why are the world’s leading languages today English, French and Spanish and not Chinese and Hindi? Why do modern Chinese and Indian cities resemble those of Europe and America and not the other way round?

The old argument is that Europeans raped both countries of their resources, setting them back by two centuries. Yet this ill-conceived and exceedingly tired argument – even if true – still begs the question of how they were able to do so in the first place, given that China and India seemed, initially, to be stronger and more advanced than Europeans? There are, as I see it, ten key foundations of European power, which have enabled this relatively small continent to rise up over the past six centuries and transform the world:

YouTube Preview Image

The key thing, of course, is that none of these components were by themselves sufficient. It was only as the foundations of power came together in synthesis that Europeans achieved an edge over other continents. The only question remaining, then, is what will happen to Europeans if they give up the means that provided them with this ‘edge’ – and if the rest of the world catches up?

• For anyone interested in these questions, I recommend the documentary series entitled The Day the World Took Off, which was made to commemorate the Millennium by a group of academics based at the University of Cambridge. Click here to download each programme.

• Images: World Map: RokerHRO; Fields: Mattias Süßen; Horses: Mikel Ortega; Bread: Chmee2; Star Fort: Gebruiker: Bourtange.

Recent Posts Tagged 'Geopolitics'

European Geostrategy | 1:53, 3 July 2010

Are the United States and European Union drifting apart? What will this mean for both powers in an increasingly non-European world? And how can a new alliance be formed between two equal partners?

European Geostrategy | 13:32, 30 June 2010

The European Union was supposed to abolish European geopolitics through the extension of ‘civilian power’. But recent developments, including the retreat of American power and the resurgence of Russia, has altered the geopolitical balance in Europe. Does this provide a new opportunity for the United Kingdom?

European Geostrategy | 1:34, 6 June 2010

This video explains the geography of American, Chinese, Indian and European power in Eurasia’s maritime zone and how the region is likely to evolve over the next few decades.

European Geostrategy | 2:06, 6 May 2010

Why will the European Union be unable to develop a strong and close relationship with South Korea? How can this deficit in what might otherwise be a tight political and economic relationship be remedied? What must Europeans do?

European Geostrategy | 5:06, 24 March 2010

Where are Britain and France’s overseas military stations located? How do they cover the world map? What could be their eventual purpose? This short video reveals all!

European Geostrategy | 21:37, 14 March 2010

What is geostrategy? Does it lead to conquest, imperialism and empire? Is it about power and control? It can be those things and it can lead to ruinous behaviour. But does it have to be? Think again…

European Geostrategy | 16:36, 10 March 2010

With the Treaty of Lisbon implemented, the new High Representative in power, and movement over the establishment of the European External Action Service, has the time come for a European Union Strategic Defence Review?

European Geostrategy | 1:19, 7 March 2010

The Falkland Islands have once again become a diplomatic storm-in-a-teacup between Argentina and Britain. But what is the geopolitical significance of the Falkland Islands? And why is it in the European interest that Britain keep hold of them?

European Geostrategy | 13:44, 26 February 2010

President Herman Van Rompuy is often poked as a figure of fun. But does his first speech on foreign and security policy reflect a closet Machiavellian, plotting and strategising to flesh out the European interest?

European Geostrategy | 0:51, 18 February 2010

With the rise of an increasingly multipolar world, the time has come for Europeans to invoke their maritime geography once again and look beyond their borders to concentrate on the wider world. The European Union needs to form an immensely powerful navy, which can be used to circulate maritime power around the world and undergird the success of the European economy.

Comments Off
FireStats icon Powered by FireStats